in:
Oxford [u.a.]:
2013
,
64 (2013), 263, S. 105 - 126 S.
| Weitere Suche mit: | |
|---|---|
Weitere Informationen
| Einrichtung: | Ariadne | Wien |
|---|---|
| Verfasst von: | Sutherland, Kathryn info |
| In: | |
| Jahr: | 2013 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Beschreibung: | |
| Jane Austen had dealings with several publishers, eventually issuing her novels through two: Thomas Egerton and John Murray. For both, Austen may have been their first female novelist. This essay examines Austen-related materials in the John Murray Archive in the National Library of Scotland. It works in two directions: it considers references to Austen in the papers of John Murray II, finding some previously overlooked details; and it uses the example of Austen to draw out some implications of searching amongst the diverse papers of a publishing house for evidence of a relatively unknown (at the time) author. Together, the two approaches argue for the value of archival work in providing a fuller context of analysis. After an overview of Austen's relations with Egerton and Murray, the essay takes the form of two case studies. The first traces a chance connection in the Murray papers between Austen's fortunes and those of her Swiss contemporary, Germaine de Staël. The second re-examines Austen's move from Egerton to Murray, and the part played in this by William Gifford, editor of Murray's Quarterly Review and his regular reader for the press. Although Murray made his offer for Emma in autumn 1815, letters in the archive show Gifford advising him on one, possibly two, of Austen's novels a year earlier, in 1814. Together, these studies track early testimony to authorial esteem. The essay also attempts to draw out some methodological implications of archival work, among which are the broad informational parameters we need to set for the recovery of evidence. | |
| Anmerkung: | |
| Literaturangaben | |
| Gesamten Bestand von Ariadne anzeigen | |
| Datensatz im Katalog der Einrichtung anzeigen | |